Articles 302/147/148 and 149 Criminal Code (V 1898), Section 417 (2A) against the verdict of evidence have brought unconvincing improvements to the prosecution's witnesses who were not only witnesses of the occasion, but also to strengthen. ? The prosecution's case failed to inspire confidence, without naming any respondent / accused, an FIR was lodged on the basis of the charge, which was carried out with sticks, although witnesses allegedly made it. But the situation was a lie, and there was a collision between the eye and the medical evidence. All the witnesses were related to the deceased and they failed to calculate their presence at the time and place of the victim. Had relations with themselves. It was not enough to dismiss their evidence, but the court always seeks independent cooperation In the present case, the witness's claim was not only a lengthy claim, but also sufficient to raise serious doubts about its fact. The suspicion that the eyewitnesses were present at the scene at the time of the incident was met, with the prosecution failing to prove the motive for the alleged eye. At the time of the incident, witnesses were not uncommon, because they did not try to save the deceased's life and did not even try to catch the culprits by which the witnesses said that the witnesses were treated as normal human behavior. Was ill. The trial court's findings and conclusions were drawn by the verdict, under which the accused was acquitted of the charge, which cannot be interfered with.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
