MUHAMMAD HASSAN BALOCH versus DIRECTOR, MANPOWER TRAINING
Section 42 & Su 54 Civil Service Suite Declaration and Permanent Responsibility for Permanent Removal Department The plaintiff was serving in the Department of Labor and the workforce and was given official residence, but after the division of the authorities : The allocation of the allotment was canceled by the department, division of the houses with one department and the allottee belonging to another, but such distribution did not change the status of the legitimate allottee in any way. Had to go through a legal way to obtain such occupancy without occupying the premises, therefore, to seek evidence Will be denied. Do not change the result: The authorities were owners and could not be prevented from occupying or allotting a dwelling on the premises, but in each case the proceedings or orders made must be in accordance with the law, which has jurisdiction to amend. With, has been announced. That in facilitating the allotment, the plaintiff in question had a legitimate allotment of land, therefore, with the law, the High Court further declared that the plaintiff was instructed to hand over the vacant possession of the plaintiff and that the letter no in the favor of the defendant. There is no legal effect. And that's where revision was allowed
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
