Sections 9, 10, 19, 27 and 30 of the Criminal Code (v. 1898), section 555, were charged with abolishing the illegal occupation of cranes and birds under the Balochistan Wildlife Protection Act of 1974. Was accused of pregnancy. All the accused were found guilty and the Judicial Magistrate fined them a thousand rupees and allowed the Crane Court to release 190 cranes in their possession on the request of the Executive District Officer, Forest and Wildlife Priority. Received remand. To recover and deliver all cranes seized from the Judicial Magistrate, the Forest Officer, according to unconstitutional orders, had died of infection due to a contagious virus infection, while the accused was an FI against the Magistrate. Rupees were deposited. The illegal custody of the accused did not take into account the number of birds, but instead they included the persons involved, and imposed a maximum fine of Rs. 1,000 each on illegal possession. As a separate offense, the fine should have been in accordance with the fine and the fine up to Rs 1000 was fixed in 1974 and the magistrate should have kept the intention of the legislature as well. The fact that after 37 years has passed, the value of money has dropped substantially and that one accused was fined Rs 1000 and not on one crane, neither could be considered sufficient, and neither could be considered sufficient. That could have been a lesson for criminals. Filed an appeal against the magistrate's decision and the session court did not interfere with the magistrate's decision on the score.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
