The defendant (appellant), accused of apprehending evidence for Section 9 (c) drug possession, alleged that he was searched at the Lewis check post and found 13 packets of marijuana containing 13 kilograms of marijuana hidden in his secret palms. ? The vehicle trial court sentenced the accused under Section 9 (c) of the Drug Control Act, 1997. The convictions were such that it could not be safely said that 100 grams of drugs sent for analysis were saved from each slab. After a delay of two and a half months, samples were sent for analysis. That the allegedly intoxicated substance was not weighed on the spot. That the recall note was not made on the site, and that the suspect had purchased a ticket to travel in the seized vehicle, which was from a company, that the validity suspect had failed to present a ticket or person to the alleged company. , Which had a vehicle prosecution. Established the fact that the accused was driving alone, the fact was requested by the prosecution's witness statement alleging that he failed to indicate any illicit desire or hatred. That is, all the prosecution witnesses consistently state that 13 packets, containing rods and slabs, were recovered from the possession of the suspects and a total of 100 grams from each packet were collected for analysis. Samples were separated through a memo in the presence of the officials, who handed it over to the chemical specialist, sending samples Was analyzed with. Delays cannot allow Scott to be released due to delays, though preparation of recovery memos and other actions on the site is false.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
