FARZANA ROOHI versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Term / Accident Petitioner The applicant's scope was a train driver while he was on duty due to a heart attack and after driving the train, the authorities requested the applicant to the Medical Board. It was advisable to consult the court for stay. When his father died of heart attack eight years after his death, when the petitioner's father suffered a heart attack, he was not only away from his family but also in the performance of his officer. Even in a foreign country, he was far away from his own country. Duties, which can play an important role even in the event of his death, as he was with his family at the time of a heart attack, and in his own country, can be reasonably expected in timely and better medical care. May be. In order to avoid the misfortune of having suffered a heart attack, the death of the applicant's father was accidental death and he fell under the section of Workin's Compensa. The Tune Act, 1923, for the purpose of sanctioning compensation, authorities mistakenly advised the court to constitute a medical board to ascertain the cause of his father's death, eight years after his death Following the restoration of the body, the High Court directed authorities to pay the applicants and other legal heirs of the labor according to their entitlements, who are entitled to them under the law and put aside the order passed by the authorities. r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
