The suit for the recovery of section 23 damages was the application of the mala fide actions thumb to the plaintiff's government employee who was found to be guilty of a government order passed by the defendant, which was based on the Malay Fide Trial Court and the High Court. Case dismissed by The orders of the plaintiff approved by the plaintiff were changed by the authorized authority and they were found to be unauthorized that several official documents were brought into the record by the plaintiffs of the plaintiffs, who neither objected to the documents. Nor was their contents challenged in the trial court. Although at the stage of the evidence the plaintiff failed to verify the damages claimed under it, it did not mean that the plaintiff was not entitled to award damages in the face of the material brought on the record under the rule of thumb. During their trial, the plaintiff was generally entitled to damages for the mental torture he was sued for, because of the plaintiff's behavior, the Feder requested special occasions to establish personal retaliation against the defendant. Due to which he claims he suffered damages and mental injury and the evidence brought by the plaintiff in support of the claim for damages was sufficient to provide general damages. Plaintiff's trial against the defendant set aside the judgment and orders passed by the trial court and the High Court, and partially dismissed the claim in favor of the plaintiff that he had up to 10 lakh rupees at the rate of 10%. Was entitled to damages. Appeal for recovery was allowed
