Re-review of evidence of drug (C) drug evidence evidence of recovery benefit of restoration Case property, failure to construct a 20kg chassis was recovered from secret door caves and a car spare wheel suspect convicted by trial court Sentenced and sentenced to life imprisonment - it was restored by the High Court's jurisdiction, although prosecutors sought to confirm the testimony of the witnesses with the report of the forensic science laboratory that the secret cave was recovered. The taboo thing was charisma, yet the sanctity of the laboratory report was erased from evidence of a position that could not. Answer exactly where the samples were located between the dates when they were allegedly seized from the vehicle and the name obtained by the forensic science laboratory, the official witnesses could not say. The samples were never sent to the laboratory when the samples were sent for examination and which officer took them. Laboratory case property, car spare wheel, was never presented during the trial as to whether such a large quantity of drugs could be contained. Whether or not the element of doubt surrounding the prosecution case forced the court to believe that the prosecution had retained the conviction. He failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt the case, by the courts of the accused was punished and had to appeal was acquitted of charges
