Find a Lawyer

AJMAL KHAN versus STATE

Article 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Qatil Ahmed, the appellate court of the Appeal of the relevant court of the witnesses, was granted by the Supreme Court to consider the accused's conviction that it was not evidence and only two witnesses There are witnesses who were so closely related to the victims that they could not adequately explain their presence on the spot. And was the court upheld the decision under appeal by keeping in view the principles laid down by the Supreme Court for the administration of justice?

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• ABDUL MAJEED KHAN v. TAWSEEN ABDUL HALEEM 2012 PLC(CS) 574
• TARIQ IQBAL @ TARIQ v. State 2012 SCMR 575
• AMJAD ALI v. State 2012 SCMR 577
• Mir ZAMAN v. State 2012 SCMR 580
• WATAN PARTY v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2012 SCMR 584
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2012 SCMR 593
• CHAIRMAN, FBR v. IDREES TRADERS 2012 SCMR 597
• GHULAM MURTAZA v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2012 CLD 598

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

immigration advocate from Karak lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes