Sections 7 (1) and 2 (i) (B) of the Punjab Civil Servant (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, 1974, R8 inter-seniority appellant (civil servants) and defendants (public servants) temporarily in BS 17 Was set. Respondents in the posts were assigned to the \ development \ projects that were foreign-funded and after the closure of the project, they were adjusted against permanent positions based on the length of their services under the provisional plans, The defendants were then placed on appeal in the Appellate Division of the List of Appellants that the defendants were working on temporary "development" projects and their salaries were paid for with foreign monitoring assistance, therefore, they were sent to Punjab. Government employees were not public servants in view of section 2 (i) (b) of the Act. , 1974; This person is appointed to a project post on a yearly basis, seniority cannot be granted for permanent visas appointments against permanent positions or against \ non-development \ positions. The Service Tribunal was wrong in knowing that merely changing posts from \ development to \ non-development posts, did not change the appointments, terms and conditions of service or the nature of the seniority of the operational unit / cadre and parties. I, and the delay in challenging seniority litigation cannot be grounds for not appealing the appellants as the termination of seniority is a violation of the law and is a frequent cause and can be challenged at any time. Appellants concluded that because the respondents were appointed against certain schemes, they were dismissed and adjusted against specific positions after the removal of earlier posts.
