Arts 204 and 184 (3) of the Supreme Court in the case of contempt of court Ordinance (V of 2003), Sections 3 and 5 of the National Reconciliation Ordinance (LX of 2007), Dr Mobasheer Hassan v Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2010 SC 265) I wrote a letter to the authorities in Switzerland, requesting the government to restore mutual legal assistance requests and to secure the status of a civilian party and alleged foreigners, including the former Prime Minister of Switzerland (Predo). Claiming money laundering money as an incumbent Prime Minister's) contempt of Supreme Court for failing to comply with these Supreme Court directives. In Lazam, the convict was sentenced and, as a result, he lost membership of the National Assembly, and as a result the office of the Prime Minister, he said, with equal power for the incoming Prime Minister, by the Supreme Court. Applying the directives issued, the Supreme Court observed that the newly elected Prime Minister Ari had assumed charge of his post and he would follow the order of the Attorney General from the court and it was directed to seek instructions from the Prime Minister and Inform the court of your current Prime Minister's response. The Attorney General submitted that the matter was taken at a cabinet meeting which desired that the Ministry of Law should present its views in relation to the implementation of the aforesaid directive, and when the Law of the Ministry had sought If you submit your opinion, the cabinet will then decide according to the constitution clause. The Supreme Court observed that the response of the present Prime Minister is difficult to accept or accept as the present Prime Minister's predecessor adheres to the relevant Supreme Court directives.
