Sections 7 (a) and (b) benefit from being suspected of responding to terrorist death evidence from terrorist proceedings. Police investigating the identity of the suspect in the FIR has been claimed by the police. Fired at the party which resulted in the death of a constable. He was sentenced to death by the trial court but the High Court changed the sentence to life imprisonment. Plaintiff, by the defendant, said it was nighttime and the identity of the attacker could not be proven on record as the suspect was already known to the complainant and the prosecution's witnesses were left behind. Unconfirmed and unproven, as the accused had neither criminal background nor the accused's involvement on the record, the question is how can the complainant and the prosecution witness identify the accused, an absent responding report An hour-long delay also gave birth. This argument did not take place in the case in which the prosecution and the time forecasted sought to integrate the e-prosecution case, which proved to be very successful when the delay was then more deadly. When the police station was 11 km apart, it happened on a metal road. The latter's Court of Justice observed that the quality of evidence should have been higher than in any criminal case, when, according to the prosecution, it was a case of a police encounter and it was necessary that such a case be investigated as well. Should have Some other agency, such as the police could not investigate the matter, punished an investigation that lacks a free character.
