Sections 100 and 302 (b) (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 342 Conviction Aa Reppreasel of Proof of Self-doubt Cross-version Impact Trial Court convicted the accused under Section 302 (b), PPC And sentenced him. He was sentenced to death but the High Court sentenced him under section 230c (c), PPC and sentenced him to 15 years imprisonment. Apart from the oral statements of eyewitnesses, there is nothing in the record. Both can establish the presence of witnesses. His presence on the scene was suspicious, his testimony cannot be relied on as a charge that he could be convicted of a major capital charge but similar evidence about the involvement of the co-accused. Was denied, as it cannot be relied on to rely on the same evidence. Accused of statements of both witnesses, the accused has not received any collusion from any piece of independent evidence in the capital's allegations, reports Franz Science Laboratory on pistol status, along with the vacancy of the offenses. Recovered from, although the same was sent to the forensic science laboratory, presented by the prosecution alone was not sufficient to confirm the account of the pistol recovering from the accused alone, which was not credible when both versions had intercourse. Were put in place, the version offered by the accused was natural and it was reliable The accused received five fireworks wounds at the hands of the deceased and his companion fell into semi-consciousness and fired only one shot to save his life in which he washed his own life.
