Section 2 (2 (b) Qatil Ahmed) Proof of References The trial court sentenced the accused under section 2302 (b), PPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment while the co-accused was acquitted, the accused appealed. Excluded, the accused's appeal was dismissed was that the FIR was not immediately recorded and that both witnesses were not present on the spot and their statements had been falsely corrected that the alleged evening. I was located and the FIR was filed on the same day at 9 o'clock, but the postmortem was done the next morning at ten o'clock, which raised the question if f The IR was filed, so why was the post-mortem report processed so late? The post-mortem report provided fifteen to sixteen hours of time between death and post-mortem, so, with a delay in filing an FIR Not used as a contradictory piece of evidence against the accused, whose medical evidence contradicts the ocular account that the incident was reported immediately after the ad presented two witnesses, the deceased's father and brother, Acular To prove the account, but both were related to the defendant and said that eyewitnesses are witnesses of the occasion. The event was not present at the residence or business disputes. At that moment, the spot and the question mark was how the witnesses arrived at the scene and how they saw the incident, he said that the witnesses claimed to have seen the incident and that the accused was only a casualty in the back of the victim's ear. But the same witnesses who died were left with two bullet wounds on the forehead and left eye.
