Find a Lawyer

CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB versus SHAFIQUE AHMAD CHAUDHRY

Section 7 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 212 (3) Prevention of loss and recovery of public exchequer, fine of financial engineers and store keepers in irrigation department Appeals filed by the officials are on record by the accuracy of the service tribunal There is no evidence available to prove that the engineers were responsible for the direct purchase and that they were not involved in such practice. Be honest or that there is a financial benefit to the store keepers through their financing and with responsibility No control can be found. The Tribunal had rightly rejected the departmental authority's order regarding irregularities in procurement.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• SUO MOTU ACTION REGARDING NON-PAYMENT OF THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT TO THE POOR ELECTRICIAN 2012 SCMR 437
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. State 2012 SCMR 440
• IMRAN KHAN v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2012 SCMR 448
• Dr. AKHTAR HASSAN KHAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2012 SCMR 455
• Syed YOUSAF RAZA GILLANI v. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 2012 PLD 466
• MASOOD AHMED BHATTI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, M/O. Information Technology and Telecommunication 2012 PLC(CS) 470
• MUHAMMAD ILYAS SHEIKH v. SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS 2012 PLC(CS) 487
• Prof. Dr. SHAMIM HASSAN, UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES v. Dr. WASEEM ABBAS ZAIDI 2012 PLC(CS) 491

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

pakistani advocates Tobatek Singh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes