CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB versus MALIK ASIF HAYAT
Section 4 Rules of Business (Punjab), 1974, Schedule VII, Part A, Senior Number 20 General Clauses Act (X9 of 1897), Sections 21 and 24 Constitution of Pakistan, Art 212 (3) Appellate Assistant Sub Inspector dismissed from employment. The order issued by the Chief Minister's Service Tribunal in June lant 199ated44 on the charge of dismissing the appeal by the Chief Minister's Service Tribunal, after accepting the mercy petition for reinstatement of the Appellant in service in June 2005 service in in. Continuing, implementing such instruction by the Authority, completing one year \ D completion by the Applicant of the course and then enrolling its name in the list \ E entering Issue a show cause notice by the Authority after alleging that the appellant's rehabilitation was illegal two years after the development appointment to the post of Sub-Inspector, during the constitutional event, the return of such cause notice by the Authority The petitioner was filed against the applicant and consequently upon his termination of the post of Inspector from the position of Inspector, which was accepted on the same basis on 5, 1997. Appellant's appeal from the service tribunal cannot be precluded from terminating the service, unless an authoritative authority has been expressly authorized by law and formed under a mistrial. This process cannot be created at any time. It would be dangerous for service structures to initiate proceedings against such wrongdoers, which could not be rectified after a long period during which the appellant not only performed his duties diligently. In fact, he also got some promotions and inspectors
