CH. QAISER MEHMOOD versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATION AND WORKS
Section 14 (2) Delivery of the notice to the parties between the award delivery claimant (the appellant) and the public department (defendant) is resolved by arbitration by the arbitral court claimant, district attorney and a representative representing the public department. Make statements before. Before the court, he would not object to making a confessional statement from the award authority, saying that the Scope Syed official requested a postponement for filing an objection to the award but was dismissed by the trial court. According to the trial court's order that the public and district attorneys were not authorized to make privileged statements before the trial court, and under section 14 (2) of the Arbitration Act 1940, notice to the parties after the arbitration Were to be taken. The award of the claimant's request for appointment of arbitrators was valid before the Department Arbitration Award was made by the aforementioned official before the court, saying that the official represented the government department and the day on which the award was filed. And the court has never inquired into the court's subsequent dates. The officer has the option to represent him or make a statement on his behalf. In fact, the official filed an application before the trial court for filing an objection to the arbitration award, which shows that he has been representing the Executive Engineer of the Government Department (XEN). Representing the Government Department during the arbitration proceedings, the said officer did not even question the authority of the State Department to make a statement and said
