He was allegedly shot dead in section 497 Impeachment Code (XLV of 1860), sections 302, 337A (ii) and 34 assassinations, Shuja Modia, joint intent bail, grant of co-accused persons. Hecht injured a witness while he (the injured) tried to help the victims. The defendants' convictions were that medical and ocular evidence contradicted each other because according to the ocular version, the injured witness was hit by a hatchet duplicate, while medical reports said he was hurt. The sharp thing is that the FIR was filed after the consultation and the whole family of the accused was included. He was accused of injuring a witness with his hatchet, which was not enough to prove whether he shared a common intention with the co-accused in the murder of the victim. Is not charged under Section 497, CRPC Prohibition. Accurate ocular accounts and medical records were not compatible with each other because according to the ocular evidence the broken side of the hatchet was used while medical evidence said the injury was caused by sharp weapon, according to the FIR. Was taken to the hospital first and after that the FIR was registered at 7 pm 30 minutes, while every medical record, according to the injured, was presented to the hospital at 8 pm, which meant that maybe The medical record was accurate and did not reflect the exact time when the FIR was filed. Only the dead body can be decided on the prohibited clause of section 497, CRPC was not attracted to the case of the accused as Agha on the charge of injury. Through it
