MUHAMMAD YOUSAF BUTT versus P.C. ABDUL LATEEF SHAR
Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/365/34/109 of abduction, abduction or abduction or secretly and improperly imprisoning, joint intent, revocation of liberty The accused (policeman) was a part of the police party that killed the complainant's son (deceased) in the police encounter. The High Court granted the accused's bail on the basis that no witnesses to the prosecution had made it to the crime commission Was not included. Except for the defendant's statement under Section 161, CRPC, there was no material available to the prosecution other than to link him to the crime, therefore, his false allegation cannot be dismissed. The complainant's conviction was that the accused confessed in his statement under Section 161, CRPC, that he was a member of the police party involved in the encounter in which the victim was killed, and that the accused also gave his bail. The same fact was acknowledged in the petition before the District Judge Validati accused confessed in his statement under Section 161, CR PC, that he was a police party member who killed the accused in the encounter. In a bail plea filed before the District Judge, the accused confessed to the murder of the victim in front of the District Judge accused himself in the alleged crime. Or was it and he couldn't escape it on a temporary basis. His statement after admitting to being a member of the police party in the killing of the victim, how he damaged the police officers or their property, confessed that no one was injured in the encounter. ? There was ample material on record to link the accused to the commission of the alleged crime, which the appellant dismissed.
