Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR, TOBA TEK SINGH versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ

Section 115 Revision Request / Request Deadline The rule and scope of 90 days for filing a revision request was relevant only when it was filed by a person or party for action but when the court If you use the self-editing options, this kind of restriction would not remain. Section 115 (1), CPC When the merits of the matter have been demanded that the challenged order be set aside, the High Court refrained from hearing similar under section 115 (1), CPC. Should not be banned, simply because the application was filed by someone. Which was bound by the limits

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• ADNAN A. KHAWAJA v. THE STATE 2012 SCMR 1917
• PRESIDENT BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2012 SCMR 1928
• Mst. FAKHRA BEGUM v. Mst. SADIA ASHRAF 2012 SCMR 1931
• HASIL KHAN v. State 2012 SCMR 1936
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF BUTT v. P.C. ABDUL LATEEF SHAR 2012 SCMR 1945
• PRESIDENT BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2012 SCMR 1950
• PUR BUX v. State 2012 SCMR 1955
• PRESIDENT BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2012 SCMR 1958

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

law websites from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes