Articles 142 and 144 of the Special Relief Act (in 1877), the scope of the limitation on the possession of suits 8 and 9 and the enforcement of Arts 142 and 144, under Article 142 of the Limitation Act 1908, the Limitation Act 1908, The limitation period for possession of immovable property, when the claimant was in possession of the property and was occupied or discharged, was 12 years from the date of settlement. The defining factor in the discharge of the occupation was the date of dispossession or discontinuation of the occupation, the expression `dispossession 'in which the original physical disposal is referred to and the collective occupation, exclusion and use, except constructive occupation, owner Had to stay close to establish it would be occupied to show that the owner had withdrawn his intention to give up the property. And that gap was filled by another person, who came to occupy the result of such a withdrawal when the lawsuit was filed, not on the basis of withdrawal or withdrawal from the occupation, but Article 142 of the Title Act. On the basis of this, 1908 would not be attractive in this case when section 142 of the Limitation Act 1908 was applied only when a case for possession of immovable property was filed on the ground that the party was on the land. Possession, and it was seized or seized, but when the case for possession of immovable property was filed on the basis of title Oops I, Section 142 Limitation Act, did not apply to 1908, but Article shall reign over the term of 144 premises, after Article 144 to / deleting from 25 4 1997, had no other article of this. Limitation of filing a title or interest based on property under the Limitation Act, 1908
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
