CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF (NAZIM AALA AUGAT), AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZ versus SAIN GHULAM AHMED NISAR
Section 109 (a) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), section 42 (11) (d) (e) is appealed to the Supreme Court, where the subject matter of the dispute amounts to the importance of the article. For the first time, even in court and in appeal, unless it is different from any act of Parliament, the Fifty Thousand rupees and the appellate court, ie the decision of the High Court Court, immediately change, change or set the final order ? The following shall be directly appealed before the intention of the Supreme Court of the Legislature, citing any sum determined by the Act of Parliament, which shall clearly mean that it has increased the sum of Rs. Is referenced. Legislation in the Civil Procedure Code. 1908 expresses its intention by using the word, unless it is different from any Act of Parliament, and the same is referred to in clauses (d) and (e) of subsection (11) of section 42 of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Into the brackets. Under the Interim Constitution Act of 1974, a direct appeal would lie to the Supreme Court if the amount or value of the subject matter in the first court as well as the appeal before the Supreme Court is not less than fifty thousand or the value of any increase. Was. The Act stated, and the final order or final order of the judgment presented before the Court was varied or set aside by the High Court. The legislature's intention was clear on the point that if there was no difference in the High Court. If so, change his decision or put it aside. In the court below, the court was not able to appeal directly to the Supreme Court, although the amount or value of the subject was more than fifty thousand rupees, the Constitution set the minimum value of the claim, unless the Parliament
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
