BASHIR HUSSAIN ALIAS MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD
Section 2 (d) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Administration for Vacant Property Act 1957, Sections 18 and 18 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), approved the cancellation of Section 42 allotment of land having 1 kanal and 1 marl. Was gone The custodian of the IQV property appellant, who allegedly seized 2 acres of marijuana, 3 acres of land in the said land, ordered the transfer of allotment permit and property rights to Altari and forged and fabricated documents, namely the affidavit. On what appellant's basis the Secretary succeeded in canceling the allotment of land occupied by an order issued by the Office of the Rehabilitation Allottee, challenging the cancellation order, which filed the writ petition, which was filed by the High Court. Authentication accepted when Alliance accepts allegedly false documents regarding the allotment Were done Developed by the appellant, the allottee was abroad with her husband canceling all the PR allotments and then proceedings for the allotment in favor of the appellant were initiated in the absence of the allotment, which was filed by the government administration. Section 18 (7) of the Esquire Property Act 1957 was a clear violation of the government's legal provisions, it was empowered to repeal! Allotment, where it is proved on the basis of inquiry that the Allottee has given up or agreed to cancel the allotment. And under section 18 (1) (c) of the Act, Custodian was also empowered to revoke any allotment where it was found that the allotment was in violation of the law or its jurisdiction. There was nothing on the record front that he could do. A.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
