ZIA AKBAR versus THE STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL
Section 426 Deterioration Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Conviction for possession of unauthorized and unlicensed weapons The accused, on bail, is undergoing CCP appeals dismissal, but after the trial court sentenced, the initial conviction of innocence in favor of the accused was not available to the accused / suspended appeal court. The reasons for recording were, according to Super Tenant Prison, sections 26 Cr26, CRPC provisions 4949 and 7497 were not controlled by the CCP, but this May The principle that has been pointed out must be kept in mind when, according to Superton Tender Prison, they have already completed 10 1/2 years. And if the sentence is upheld, then he has to serve only 3 1/2/2 years imprisonment. During the decision to request the suspension of sentence, the appeal decision had to consider both the amount and timing of the sentence. The co-accused / brother of the accused and the accused accused, the co-accused company, were given 10 years rigorous imprisonment while the accused was denied bail because he was sentenced to 14 years rigorous imprisonment. Gone - only 3 years was 1/2 year, if the accused commits a rigorous sentence of 14 years, then the accused was entitled to the same treatment which was dealt with the co-accused, as they were both charged. It was reported that they had influenced the Shari'ah-approved slaughter. The court was held to the extent of the accused. His sentence was suspended and he was ordered released on bail, under circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
