Applicants claiming various reliefs for civil service appointments in scope of retaining quote warrants in relation to Article 44 Writ Petition: Ola Se that the selection committee's proceedings should be declared illegal and consequently Defendant's appointment orders should be rejected. Secondly, the merit list prepared by the selection committee should be corrected. Thirdly, as a result of a valid merit list, their appointment orders should be issued against specific seats. Fourth, a writ of warrants will be issued against the respondents on the basis of which authority of the law they hold. The applicants also filed a certificate of cancellation of the respondents' appointment orders. Relief sought, no doubt, can be obtained through a writ of certiorari and any person may file a quota warrant, but a person may at any time seek contentious relief, if the applicant, if provoked. If filed, a person may file a writ petition against them. Applicants against respondents belonging to other districts cannot be said to be enraged, there is no doubt that it was not necessary to be a provocative person to apply for a writ of garbage, no state article May file an application. Persons working in connection with the state government or government affairs need to challenge their holding authority. The e-office, but a person who sought relief for himself, could not file a warrant warrant writ because the applicants had sought relief for him, so he was in favor of the quote warrant writ.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
