Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 (1) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), the plaintiffs who filed a dissolution of marriage against the applicant for a list of witnesses who had filed a dissolution of section 42 marriage. Also added to a list. The defendant, who could not produce the witnesses listed in this list, filed another list of witnesses, which was eventually granted, and the trial court recorded the statements of the witnesses and has yet to file a lawsuit in the Family Court order. The defendant's statement remains to be recorded. The defendant challenged the Shariah court by appealing by allowing the second list. The Shariat Court accepted the appeal and the Family Court order was set aside for not setting aside whether the Family Court was a controversial order or not. A final decision. , The defendant was liable to dismiss the appeal filed before the Shariah Court, as no appeal is held against any interlocutor. The verdict in favor of the defendant's counsel was that the order passed by the Family Court. There was a final order and a petition was filed before the Supreme Court against it to allow the plaintiff to produce some other testimony from him. And this order was a mutual order and it could not be the final decision. Under the provisions of section 14 (1) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Court Act 1993, the decision of the Court of Appeal was not upheld, only the decision or the order of the Family Court. The Shariah Court's finding before the Shariat Court finding that the petition filed by the plaintiff before the Family Court was a review request. And
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
