Sections 52, & 68 and Election 70 On the election request from the candidate who has retained the election petition, it was objected that the applicant failed to show any cause of action against the returned candidate, so that the applicant could be excluded. Be done Determine if the applicant had any reason for filing an application for any relief against an individual, it was important that the application be certified to arrive at a particular conclusion. The bundle of facts must also be kept in mind, that it has a cause for action. In the present case, the applicant had made numerous allegations at his constituency polling stations regarding unfair elections and widespread harassment, showing one of the reasons for the action was to fully understand such allegations. , And not separately, the name of the returning candidate, even though the petition does not mention any allegations of illegal practice during polling, does not mean that the applicant has no reason to take action. Is the fact that the applicant filed the Public Representation Act of 1976 According to the terms of the N-70, it was not mandatory for them to hear every allegation of illegal proceedings against them, which was prayed to completely invalidate the selection of the returning candidate. Unanimous Statement of Counting Results presented by the Presiding Officer of Polling Stations, expressing astonishing and surprising results in favor of some of the constituency polling stations, by Tribunal
