Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

DR. FAHMIDA MIRZA versus SYED ALI BUX SHAH


Respondents were accused of selecting sections 14 (3) (5) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 62 (1) (f), 63 and 199 of the Provincial Assembly, for disqualification in the previous elections of local bodies. Was submitted, and there was no jurisdiction to nominate respondents' papers by the Moderate Returning Officer that the election tribunal had jurisdiction over the respondents included in Article 62 (1) (f) of the Constitution with the Returning Officer Was broad, but not more so than that for the purposes of and under section 14 (5) of the Electoral Tribunal Public Representation Act, 1976 Appellate law is wider than a forum, in which the meaning of Article 62 (1) (f) "law was not". In this way, the bar contained in the Constitution cannot be prosecuted by the court before the tribunal unless a declaration is made against it by any law. In principle, the principal appeal principle is r \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Karak lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.