Find a Lawyer

UNITED ETHANOL INDUSTRIES LTD. versus JDW SUGAR MILLS LTD.

Article 78 of the document Document preparation and proof of the document were two separate articles, the document could be presented in evidence which was always subject to proof as required under Article 78 of the evidence of the law, Court 1984 1984 Court Had jurisdiction and jurisdiction over the court. Determine the truth and authenticity of any document to reach a fair and equitable conclusion about the touchstone and parameters contained in Article 78 of the Law Evidence, 1984.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• Syed MUHAMMAD ASIF v. State 2015 PCrLJ 1406
• Syed ABBAS ALI v. BANK OF PUNJAB through Manager 2015 CLD 1409
• Haji MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. Mst. LAL KHATOON 2015 MLD 1422
• UMAR HAYAT v. Mst. RABIA BASRI 2015 YLR 1427
• Mst. KANEEZ KANWAL alias KANEEZ ZAFAR v. Mst. SHEHNAZ BIBI 2015 YLR 1443
• Mst. SADIQA BEGUM v. The PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2015 YLR 1456
• MURAD ALI KHAN v. VICE-CHANCELLOR 2015 YLR 1468
• BASHIR AHMAD v. FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2015 YLR 1484

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

how to become a advocate from Manga Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes