Find a Lawyer

MST. KANEEZ KANWAL ALIAS KANEEZ ZAFAR versus MST. SHEHNAZ BIBI

Section 47 and 12 (2) the hearing of the request for execution was dismissed on the basis that the lawful court had already settled all the questions and cases, which the applicant argued was that the executing court had set aside the cases and records. The evidence was bound that the trial court had already dealt with every aspect of the applicant's case. The property owned by the applicant was different from the holder; under section 12 (2) the applicant's application was already dismissed and the second The far right should not have been allowed to resume such an objection There was no justification for maintaining the premises, there was no need to renew the practice of formulating cases and recording evidence that had already been filed in the application filed under section 12 (2). The CPC revision was rejected in the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• Syed ABBAS ALI v. BANK OF PUNJAB through Manager 2015 CLD 1409
• Haji MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. Mst. LAL KHATOON 2015 MLD 1422
• UMAR HAYAT v. Mst. RABIA BASRI 2015 YLR 1427
• UNITED ETHANOL INDUSTRIES LTD. v. JDW SUGAR MILLS LTD. 2015 YLR 1429
• Mst. SADIQA BEGUM v. The PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2015 YLR 1456
• MURAD ALI KHAN v. VICE-CHANCELLOR 2015 YLR 1468
• BASHIR AHMAD v. FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2015 YLR 1484
• ZAHOOR AHMAD v. State 2015 YLR 1515

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

immigration advocates from Gujar Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes