Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Section 28 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Authority Accused of Accusing Water of Water The Vitality Authorities were empowered to use turbine and tube wells to obtain water for industrial and other purposes. Impose aquifer charges on persons with Permission to claim anything without prior legislation cannot be prohibited from demanding any levy or surcharge supported by any legislation solely on the basis that persons aggrieved before this law Was not taken on board, any law would be published in the Official Gazette. Applicants are widely regarded as sufficient for public notice; in the present case, they have filed their declarations and dismissed applications for temporary relief, as well as mention of subsequent appeals against these orders. Did not, the clear-handed court constitutional application was dismissed in the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• UNITED ETHANOL INDUSTRIES LTD. v. JDW SUGAR MILLS LTD. 2015 YLR 1429
• Mst. KANEEZ KANWAL alias KANEEZ ZAFAR v. Mst. SHEHNAZ BIBI 2015 YLR 1443
• Mst. SADIQA BEGUM v. The PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2015 YLR 1456
• MURAD ALI KHAN v. VICE-CHANCELLOR 2015 YLR 1468
• ZAHOOR AHMAD v. State 2015 YLR 1515
• CHAIRMAN WAPDA, WAPDA HOUSE, LAHORE v. MEGNA TECH (PVT.) LTD. 2015 YLR 1518
• PAKISTAN CHIPBOARD (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Revenue Division 2015 PTD 1520
• Syeda ABIDA HUSSAIN IMAM v. The PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2015 YLR 1522

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

best law firms from Gakhar Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes