Article 10 (2) Constitution Pakistan, Article 203 DD Application for Extension of Punishment for Definition of Adultery Proof The accused found guilty of the zina commission was found guilty under section 10 (2) of adultery. Ordinance, 1979 and he was sentenced to three years imprisonment. RI filed a revision to extend the trial with a fine of Rs. 5000, under which the trial court charged that he should be admitted. He was released from jail after serving a full prison sentence. The request for a review of the sentence increased, the federal law court for regular hearings did not, in general, exercise its review powers under Article 203 DD of the Constitution, to increase the sentence of the accused, The entire sentence of imprisonment was upheld, medical reports suggest, adding that the affected homosexual was in the habit and that no traces of violence or injury were found on any part of the affected swabs' body from the victim's vaginal, chemical inspector Received after 28 days of nasty and unclear delays in office, no semen group was placed on vaginal bush There was neither DNA test of the accused nor any statement of the victim was contradictory. , But it did not affect any conviction, nor was it supported by medical evidence that the defendant testified on the commission of the adultery bill oppression by the accused, the trial court's testimony by the defendant It was concluded that after examining the evidence, there was a voluntary party to declare the act of adultery as an act of adultery. Doubt The benefit of the doubt was given by the trial court right to the accused.
