Sections 10 (3) and 11 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) fornication, abduction, abduction or forcing a woman to marry. Appeal against acquittal No witnesses to the incident were available. Apart from the complainant, no other witness was present at the scene, statements of the prosecution's two witnesses' testimony could not be relied upon, as well as on the statement of another witness about the accused's extra-judicial confession. Could not be denied. Neither the other witness had testified against the accused, nor any specific question was raised before the accused in this regard, while recording his examination under Section 2342, the CRPC incident. The victim's statement was not credible and not credible, especially when he mentioned two different occasions at the time of the incident, namely the confession made in his statement and statement in the trial court. It was not that the affected girl could not raise her voice when she was forced from the farm / land by the accused for the commission of adultery. He was taken aback and did not appeal in the mind of a sensible person that the victim and his mother remained silent after the alleged incident of adultery till the return of the complainant / victim's husband during this case, his And there was a fight between the accused, but according to the statement of Lady Doctor, there was no sign of grief, injuries or bruises on the victim's body at the time of medical evidence, regarding the date of the victim's medical examination. There was a contradiction between the complainant, his mother as well as the complaining commission
