Defining evidence from Section 3 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), section 103 import, export, transportation, manufacture or sale of drug addicts For noncompliance with the mandatory requirement of section 103, all witnesses were CCP employees. , But the accused was not named in any of the prosecution witnesses' allegations of defamation, the trial property was presented to the court during the trial, whichever one was not in charge of the law Did not present any evidence in his defense, nor did he adequately explain his crime as being attributed to the police, and this case After his arrest was related to the situation, the police did not have any previous enmity with the accused. The circumstances, however, were not involved in this case with false allegations, nor did the trial court properly find the accused with any intention of corruption. An appeal was dismissed to the extent that the accused was convicted of the charge, but in violation of the mandatory provisions of section 103, CRPC, and non-production of property before the court during the trial. , The accused was convicted. The trial court was reduced to 2 years \ RI, and the fine was reduced to Rs. 5,000 / - \ r \ n \ r \ n
