Section 17 (3) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 427/353/186/147/149 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A) Haraba, amounting to fifty rupees, assault or harm to the offender. To prevent the public nurse from discharging her duties, public servants to stop public works, the uprising, the unlawful assembly was dismissed by the evidence of the complainant by two evidence The evidence was not substantiated by the accused, but prosecutors did not say the names of the suspects, and were told that the telephone set could be damaged. A crowd of 30/40 attacked the complainant and the accused, the prosecution's evidence was not only contradictory, but after the proper definition of the evidence, the trial court did not affect the trust, even giving the accused the benefit of the doubt. Bad telephone sets, etc. And the rifle allegedly snatched by the accused was neither presented to the court nor marked as an exhibit at the time of the recording of the evidence as a case property so as to attract the provisions of section 427. As such, the PPC evidence presented by the prosecution was not sufficient. Persons accused of interfering with the performance of public duties by the complainant. No one appeared to support the prosecution's version of the relevant department, which was very material evidence for the complainant, failing to indicate that the trial court's appeal was inaccurate, artificial, astounding. The giver was ridiculous, or was suffering from misreading or unreadable evidence, while the trial court, while rejecting the verdict, had neither
