MAQBOOL AHMAD QURESHI versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, LAW AND JUSTICE, ISLAMABAD
Section 17, Proviso (II) Balochistan Civil Servants Act (IX of 1974), Section 17, Proviso (II) of the Northwest Frontier Province Civil Servants Act (XVIII of 1973), Section 17, of the Proviso (II) Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII). (1974), Section 16, Proviso (II) Sindh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973), Article 18, Proviso (II) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 203 DD Reporters were mentioned in relation to the involvement of Islam Petitioner Proviso (II), Section 17 of the Servent Act, 1973, Proviso (II) of the Balochistan Civil Servants Act 1974, Proviso (II) of the North West Frontier Province Civil Servants Act 1973, Punjab Civil Servants Act of 1974 Proviso (II) of Section 16 And Proviso (II) was abusing the section 18 law of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973, because rehabilitation took a long time, and those who benefited from such decisions without any justification as a burden on national validity. Pending arrears are being supported. Noting that the provisions of the law do not automatically grant a period of interference between removal / removal / reduction of office and reinstatement of the original post, but the law, based on the facts, provides that such order Be given under And determines situations, questions about maintenance, etc., including seniority, cadre, and actual post-rehabilitation, post-interruption duty or leave and such, extraordinary leave / unpaid Qur'an. The petition was dismissed by the Federal Shariah Court, supporting the petitioner's claim / request from the Holy Prophet of Allah (PBUH).
