Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD MEHMOOD versus BARKAT ALI

Article 145 AJA and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Article 44 felony breach of order of peace on written petition, violation of magistrate's order and the suspension of writ by the amending court on the sale of such shop Was involved in the petition. The suit filed by the defendant against the defendant, which is under trial in the court and neither the writ petition before the High Court nor the proceedings before the magistrate, will be competent because of the civil suit between the parties concerned regarding the title of the disputed shop. ?

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2013

• Sardar RAZA MUHAMMAD KHAN v. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF KHAN 2013 CLC 1345
• Mir AQEEL-UL-ISLAM v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION BOARD, MIRPUR 2013 CLC 1355
• COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR v. DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SYSTEM 2013 CLD 1438
• BABAR JAMIL v. CONSERVATOR FOREST, MUZAFFARABAD CIRCLE 2013 PLC(CS) 1482
• State v. DILDAR HUSSAIN 2013 PCrLJ 1552
• Mst. NAZIA AZIZ v. MUHAMMAD ILLYAS 2013 MLD 1627
• TANVIR AHMED CHOUDHARY v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 CLC 1634
• MUHAMMAD ALAM v. HAQ NAWAZ KHAN 2013 CLC 1752

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2013 →

advocates from Peshawar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes