UNITED BANK LIMITED THROUGH PRESIDENT, UBL LTD., KARACHI versus LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Section O15 Industrial Relations Act (IV of 2008), Sections 41 and 55 (3) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 44 writ petition service dismissed, charge sheeting and inquiry against He was subsequently dismissed. On charges of producing a bogus bank guarantee and embezzling labor court, two employees were reinstated, while a third job complaint application was dismissed, but the appellate court set the Labor Court's decision on the third employee's threshold. Restored employees with all benefits. Corruption Corruption Charge Sheet, which was supposed to be delivered to employees within one month of the alleged corruption, more than two months after the Inquiry Officer recorded his findings that the witnesses and records presented during the inquiry proceedings were not sufficient. Was willing to plead guilty to corruption allegations and the employee was found naked only. Aint Employer Bank dismissed that the report reveals a third employee and an inquiry officer for corruption and that the bank and its officials Such an action is illegal and third employees without legal authority S action against was not wrong, it can not be sentenced to a fine. The Labor Appellate Tribunal recorded the findings of dismissal for valid and valid reasons, and all three employees were reinstated by the Labor Appellate Tribunal's Appellate Tribunal Findings, with full benefits. There was no need for any kind of greed through the High Court.
