Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HAIDER KHAN versus ABDUL RASHEED

Sections 100 and 103 The Second Appellate Power High Court Scope Principle is that the second appeal cannot be disturbed by the factual finding of fact, although it was an approved principle of law, and it was also passed under Section 100, CPC The scope was in line, but when the evidence came out. If the record was misread or a document was misinterpreted, it would become a question of law and the court may interfere in such circumstances, even in the second appeal, section 103, CPC for the purpose. Had made a room. As the aforesaid section requires the High Court to decide the dispute itself when specific evidence was in the record

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2013

• MUHAMMAD SHARIF AWAN v. AZAD GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, AJ&K, Muzaffarabad 2013 PLC(CS) 50
• UNITED BANK LIMITED through President, UBL Ltd., Karachi v. LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 PLC 113
• MEHVISH NAZIR v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 PLC(CS) 117
• MUDASSAR MANZOOR QURESHI v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT 2013 PLC(CS) 171
• MUHAMMAD ZAHID v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 PLC(CS) 295
• MUMTAZ AHMED CHISHTI v. Mir FAZAL-UR-REHMAN 2013 CLC 460
• IQRA EJAZ v. MOHI-UD-DIN ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, NERIYAN SHARIF 2013 MLD 461
• SAJIDA MAQSOOD v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR DISTRICT MUZAFFARABAD 2013 MLD 520

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2013 →

tax advocates from Chak Sawara lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes