Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE versus MST. ZATOON AKHTAR

AX, R8 suit dismissed for illegal prosecution. The request for restoration of the accuracy record showed that the relevant date was set by the Reader of Court on the previous date, when the presiding judge was on leave, nor was the presence of the plaintiff on the relevant date, nor was it the date of the hearing. Restored to conditions

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2013

• IMTIAZ ALI v. Raja LIAQAT ALI KHAN 2013 PLD 6
• Mst. RAKHMAT JAN v. UMAR MEHMOOD (Minor) 2013 PLD 8
• Mst. KOSAR FATIMA v. SHAUKAT ALI SHAH 2013 PLD 11
• MUHAMMAD KHURSHID KHAN v. MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN 2013 PLD 23
• SAJJAD HUSSAIN SHAH v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR COUNCIL SECRETARIAT 2013 PLD 34
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF AWAN v. AZAD GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, AJ&K, Muzaffarabad 2013 PLC(CS) 50
• UNITED BANK LIMITED through President, UBL Ltd., Karachi v. LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 PLC 113
• MEHVISH NAZIR v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 PLC(CS) 117

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2013 →

registration advocate from Doaaba lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes