Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. RAKHMAT JAN versus UMAR MEHMOOD (MINOR)


A. XXXII, 3, 7 and section 96 Appeal against the decree passed under the agreement between the plaintiff and the minor plaintiff through the plaintiff's duty on behalf of the plaintiff without the permission of the trial court by his father, Wladier Guardian. Could not The trial court had to inquire whether such a settlement was in the interest of the minor, and whether the interest of such a merger was with the minor defendant or not, the trial court did not apply the same to the minor defendant's mother. There was no guardian assigned accordingly. The de facto guardian was able to see the interest of his minor son as the mother of his next friend had officially filed such an appeal on behalf of the minor son, deciding the affected decree under section 96. Can't understand, conditions

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Parachinar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.