MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus MINISTRY OF EDUCATION THROUGH SECRETARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD
Article 18 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199, 189, 25 and 4 Civil Service Enhancement Employees Benefit of the decision of the service tribunal that was similarly kept but were not a party to the proceedings The petitioners decided the Supreme Court and the service tribunal. Advocates asked their colleagues, who were similarly hired to raise salaries, university officials (employers) said that applicants could not be benefited because they could not stand before a service tribunal or Supreme Court justification. There were no parties to take action once. The decision was taken by the Supreme Court, determining any question of law or contempt of law, the same was binding on all the courts of Pakistan. The Supreme Court's decision becomes a directive that everyone has to follow when it benefits a person. After the Supreme Court verdict, all such other persons will also be entitled to the same relief, regardless of whether the FT was a party to the CT litigation whether or not the service tribunal's decision. On the basis of which the employee was given an advantage, the refusal to avail the other employees in the same way was a violation of Article 4 and Article 25 of the Constitution applicants, in the circumstances, was entitled to salary / increase. According to the Constitution application was allowed
