Prior to the trial of Sections 265F and 342, the recording of the evidence by the trial court against the accused was given the scope punishment and the CRPC charge recorded without the procedure provided under Section 265F which But he did not prove a crime, no prosecution witness appeared during the trial, and the trial court ordered the accused to plead, under which the accused allegedly committed his crime. Approved Therefore, the trial court sentenced the convict and sentenced the defendant to file evidence after pleading guilty and when the court did not, in his discretion, convict the offender. On such a request, the accused, the court should proceed to examine the witnesses, in view of section 265F, the CCP suspects also had the opportunity to present their written statement as the process of presenting the defense evidence was charged under section 342. Came at the time of writing the statements of In the present case, no admission of guilt was available on record, neither the accused nor in any case denied any request to confess his crime under section 6565FF, the accused under section 222 of the CCPC. Adopted by the trial court, the PC trial court did not adopt appropriate legal procedures, such as sentencing and sentencing. He was set aside and the trial was set before the trial court
