Section 118 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. XXXVII, Rr. 1 and 2, suits for recovery of money on the basis of a compromised note, on the basis that the plaintiff's mode and location were excluded. I'm silent. The justification for payment etc. Since the defendant had not filed any leave for defense, the trial court was required to order the case in terms of O XXXVII R 2 (2), CPC and it was not necessary that the defendant To give the former partner for Evidence is not required to go to the trial court in place of payment, and payment method, etc., as discussed in the law of negotiation device under section 118 of 1881 in relation to the instrument of communication. What was to be done unless such an idea was rejected. By the defendant, and in the present case, the defendant did not reject the trial court's conclusions, therefore, was incorrect. And the unclean order was put aside and the case ordered, appeals allowed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
