Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR versus MST. NABEELA TAJ

Under section 16 and 30 (2) of the Government Land Colonization Act, under the auto-jurisdiction under the auto-jurisdiction, the allotment of government land by a tenant to a tenant and the re-operation of the land by a tenant. Cancel Once the purchase and sale agreement has been completed on the basis of the absence of any record in the office in 1912, the parties will cease to rule under such terms as the person involved in such action against the allottee / buyer. Will give In the absence of tenant misunderstanding or tenant ineligibility in pursuance of the terms and conditions of such work or otherwise to the Board of Revenue in the case of tenancy or ownership rights in such territory. There is no option to cancel or resume such work.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• MUHAMMAD AMIR v. State 2015 YLR 1582
• WAPDA through Chairman v. KHALID PERVAIZ 2015 YLR 1598
• Hafiz NAZIR AHMED v. ZAIN UL ABIDEEN 2015 YLR 1606
• ZAHEER AHMAD BABAR v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE 2015 YLR 1617
• Sardar ALI MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD AYYUB 2015 YLR 1649
• NOOR SUGAR MILLS LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2015 PTD 1653
• HASEEB WAQAS SUGAR MILLS LTD. v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2015 PTD 1665
• MUHAMMAD AAMIR v. NAZIA BIBI 2015 YLR 1667

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

tax advocates from Landi Kotal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes