MUHAMMAD ARIF versus CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD
Article 27 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 25 and 199 Constitutional Applicants Land of the affected applicant was obtained by non-payment of compensation and the award states that the applicant will be compensated through plot allotment in his favor. ? The applicant claimed in a six-month period that despite two years had passed, he was not paid any compensation and it was requested that the Development Authority be instructed to pay him the Development Authority claimed that the record of acquisition. It took a long time to get ready but was close. The position of the Complementary Property Development Authority on this issue was weak, ridiculous, and a fraudulent High Court directed the Development Authority to provide the applicant with the compensation for their acquired land, as well as all the concessions that were already in place. Has been extended to the people on board. Within a month, constitutional application was allowed, in the circumstances