Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN versus ABDUL REHMAN

Section 36 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), the suit plot for the specific performance of the sale contract to the section 12 suit which was canceled in its name was allotted to the vendor by the development authority and thereby Following the agreement, the trial court has maintained the appeal through the court. Liability When a party is unable to exercise its share of the contract because it is out of control, then the contract, although initially valid and enforceable, will be invalid and unenforceable, not a false agreement. May not be enforced nor appropriate for its implementation. This type of development authority was a process beyond the control of vendors. The affected verdicts were not subject to any unlawful action or material irregularities, the High Court dismissed the request for review in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2013

• G.M. CHAUDHRY v. Dr. KAMRAN JEHANGIR 2013 PLC(CS) 206
• NASEEMUL ALI, EX. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF TRUST MANAGEMENT SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. v. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2013 CLD 216
• FEDERAL EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, ISLAMABAD v. CAPITAL DEVELOMENT AUTHORITY, Islamabad 2013 MLD 255
• IRSHAD AHMED v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION 2013 PLC(CS) 280
• MUHAMMAD AMIN QAMAR v. THE BANK OF PUNJAB 2013 PLC 291
• MUHAMMAD ARIF v. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD 2013 YLR 295
• DAILY KHABRAIN through Chief Editor/Chief Executive v. HAMMAD HASSAN 2013 PLC 300
• MUHAMMAD YAQOOB v. MANAGING DIRECTOR/CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OGDCL, ISLAMABAD 2013 PLC(CS) 303

All Islamabad judgments of 2013 →

law websites from Machh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes