Find a Lawyer

IRSHAD AHMED versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION

Article 204 Court of Civil Service High Court Court order was complied with by the petitioners that the authorities did not comply with the order passed by the High Court. There was no definitive decision in the field to regulate applicants' services but it was linked. The result of the pending judgment before the Supreme Court, which was not fully supporting their case, did not fall within the purview of the policy made by the applicants and could not be sought for relief in any way because in the petition. It has been claimed that no clear direction can be reached. Violated by authorities

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2013

• Dr. Hafiz MUHAMMAD BASHIR v. INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD 2013 PLC(CS) 191
• G.M. CHAUDHRY v. Dr. KAMRAN JEHANGIR 2013 PLC(CS) 206
• NASEEMUL ALI, EX. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF TRUST MANAGEMENT SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. v. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2013 CLD 216
• FEDERAL EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, ISLAMABAD v. CAPITAL DEVELOMENT AUTHORITY, Islamabad 2013 MLD 255
• MUHAMMAD ZAMAN v. ABDUL REHMAN 2013 CLC 288
• MUHAMMAD AMIN QAMAR v. THE BANK OF PUNJAB 2013 PLC 291
• MUHAMMAD ARIF v. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD 2013 YLR 295
• DAILY KHABRAIN through Chief Editor/Chief Executive v. HAMMAD HASSAN 2013 PLC 300

All Islamabad judgments of 2013 →

best advocate from Rashidabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes