DHANI BUX versus VI-ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, HYDERABAD
Under Section 3 and 5 of the Unlawful Settlement Act 2005, the landlord has been charged with complaints 3 and 5 that he is the owner of agricultural land and the accused have been evicted and seized without a valid justification. Leia, the court, in the sale of the value of the land produced by the accused (s), applied for the release of such amount by the applicant, the petitioner (Harris) released the contentious amount of land deposited with the court accountant. Filed a petition before the trial court for The rees and the landlord were entitled to the extent of their respective shares in the production, therefore, the entire amount could not be released to either party, as the matter was an account recovery and the civil court was authorized to resolve such dispute. Was a legality trial. The court did not take any illegal action in rejecting the petition regarding the constitutional plea of the defendant (High Court). The present issue was also pending before the High Court revision application was dismissed and the trial court upheld the controversial order. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
