STATE/ANF THROUGH DEPUTY DIRECTOR (LAW) versus MST. MEHWISH SULTANA
The Section 31 Prohibition of Prevention of Smuggling by Property Smuggling was achieved after the issuance of a notice under Section 31 of the Smuggling Act 1977. The property property was registered and purchased by not issuing a notice to the person holding title to such property. Gift was given to the respondents by the defendant's mother in 1993 and later to the respondents Subject Property 6 1996 10 was filed in 1996, while the notice under section 31 of the Smuggling Prevention Act 1977 was stated on the property. The court issued the ban. 10 10 1996 The respondents submitted a petition before the trial court for the release of the property, which was accepted and accordingly a valid notice was issued to the accused and their accomplices under Section 31 of the Property Trafficking Act 1977 But not only was it necessary for the defendant to give notice to the defendant's mother, but also practically ical since she was the registered title owner at that time, the prosecution had no links between the accused and his accomplices Was unable to establish a business and, on the other hand, the company selling the property to the plaintiff, the prosecutor N had enough. At the time of collecting solid evidence to contact the defendant, the defendant's mother, and the company, who sold the property to the accused and his accomplices, but it was not done, the prosecution also had no evidence to prove Did not collect evidence that the defendant or his mother were. Is involved in the drug trafficking business or because they purchased a real estate or real estate through an illegal means,
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
