Sections 9 (c) and 29 Defining drug trafficking and smuggling evidence of the narcotics allegedly brought a large number of hashish on a bus that was smugglers and they knew about the presence of the hashish hidden in the bus, They also resisted the search. Such marijuana was recovered from the bus hut / cave and the accused were arrested on the spot. Such evidence added by the prosecution before the trial proved to be the crime of the accused, There is no reason for any alleged enmity or false accusation. The trial proceedings were shown by the accused anywhere, when the prosecution proved the knowledge and possession of the accused in the recovery, the burden of rejecting the charge was then transferred to the accused, but the accused Failed to delete Under Section 29 of the Control of Narcotic Substance Act, 1997, the appeal of the co-accused was already dismissed in the Supreme Court and in the case of the charges, the guilty plea of the accused was similar to that of the trial court. The defendant was convicted of proving beyond any reasonable doubt.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
